savvycom logo
  • Industries
        • Banking
        • Finance
        • Healthcare
        • Education
        • Retail
        • Manufacturing
  • Solutions
        • Digital Banking Solution
        • E-Wallet Development Solution
        • ERP Solutions
        • SavvyHIS
        • Digital Transformation Solution
        • Generative AI & Chatbot Solution
        • LMS Solutions
        • SavvyGPT
  • Services
        • Global Delivery Center Service
        • Development Team
        • Data Services
        • Cyber Security Service
        • Cloud Service
        • Blockchain Outsourcing Services
        • App Development
        • Software Development
  • Resources
        • Savvy News
        • Tech Insights
        • Case Studies
        • Paper Resources
  • About Us
Contact Us
EN
Global (English)
Korea (한국어)
Vietnam (Vietnamese)
Thailand (อักษรไทย)
Japan (日本語)
Hong Kong (广东话)
Global (English)
Korea (한국어)
Vietnam (Vietnamese)
Thailand (อักษรไทย)
Japan (日本語)
Hong Kong (广东话)
savvycom logo
  • Industries
        • Banking
        • Finance
        • Healthcare
        • Education
        • Retail
        • Manufacturing
  • Solutions
        • Digital Banking Solution
        • E-Wallet Development Solution
        • ERP Solutions
        • SavvyHIS
        • Digital Transformation Solution
        • Generative AI & Chatbot Solution
        • LMS Solutions
        • SavvyGPT
  • Services
        • Global Delivery Center Service
        • Development Team
        • Data Services
        • Cyber Security Service
        • Cloud Service
        • Blockchain Outsourcing Services
        • App Development
        • Software Development
  • Resources
        • Savvy News
        • Tech Insights
        • Case Studies
        • Paper Resources
  • About Us
Contact Us
EN
Global (English)
Korea (한국어)
Vietnam (Vietnamese)
Thailand (อักษรไทย)
Japan (日本語)
Hong Kong (广东话)
Global (English)
Korea (한국어)
Vietnam (Vietnamese)
Thailand (อักษรไทย)
Japan (日本語)
Hong Kong (广东话)
  • Industries
        • Banking
        • Finance
        • Healthcare
        • Education
        • Retail
        • Manufacturing
  • Solutions
        • Digital Banking Solution
        • E-Wallet Development Solution
        • ERP Solutions
        • SavvyHIS
        • Digital Transformation Solution
        • Generative AI & Chatbot Solution
        • LMS Solutions
        • SavvyGPT
  • Services
        • Global Delivery Center Service
        • Development Team
        • Data Services
        • Cyber Security Service
        • Cloud Service
        • Blockchain Outsourcing Services
        • App Development
        • Software Development
  • Resources
        • Savvy News
        • Tech Insights
        • Case Studies
        • Paper Resources
  • About Us
savvycom logo
Global (English)
Korea (한국어)
Vietnam (Vietnamese)
Thailand (อักษรไทย)
Japan (日本語)
Hong Kong (广东话)
  • Industries
        • Banking
        • Finance
        • Healthcare
        • Education
        • Retail
        • Manufacturing
  • Solutions
        • Digital Banking Solution
        • E-Wallet Development Solution
        • ERP Solutions
        • SavvyHIS
        • Digital Transformation Solution
        • Generative AI & Chatbot Solution
        • LMS Solutions
        • SavvyGPT
  • Services
        • Global Delivery Center Service
        • Development Team
        • Data Services
        • Cyber Security Service
        • Cloud Service
        • Blockchain Outsourcing Services
        • App Development
        • Software Development
  • Resources
        • Savvy News
        • Tech Insights
        • Case Studies
        • Paper Resources
  • About Us
Insights for Tech Enthusiasts
Best PracticesBusiness Insight

Containerization vs. Virtualization – Modern Software Needs

July 1, 2024 by Miley Do
Table Of Content
  1. Understanding Containerization vs. Virtualization
  2. Best Practices for Using Containerization vs. Virtualization
    1. Best Practices for Containerization
  3. Best Practices for Virtualization
  4. Containerization vs. Virtualization Pros&Cons
    1. Performance and Efficiency
    2. Scalability and Flexibility
    3. Security
    4. Use Cases and Industry Examples
    5. Containerization
    6. Virtualization
  5. FAQs: More about Containerization vs. Virtualization 
    1. What are the key differences between containerization and virtualization?
    2. How do containers and VMs impact performance?
    3. Which technology is better for scalability?
    4. How do containers and VMs address security?
    5. What are the best practices for managing containers and VMs?
  6. Conclusion

In the rapidly evolving landscape of software development, businesses face critical decisions regarding the infrastructure they choose to support their applications. Two leading technologies – containerization vs. virtualization – offer distinct advantages and challenges. As a leading software development company, we understand the nuances of “Containerization vs. Virtualization” is crucial for optimizing performance, scalability, and efficiency. Hence, our article helps you explore best practices and provides thought leadership on these technologies to help you make informed decisions for your projects. If you have IT needs, consider partnering with Savvycom, one of the top 10 IT providers in Vietnam, known for delivering value-for-money tech solutions.

Containerization vs. Virtualization

Understanding Containerization and Virtualization

Understanding Containerization vs. Virtualization

Containerization: Containerization is a lightweight form of virtualization that involves encapsulating an application and its dependencies into a container. Containers share the host system’s kernel but run in isolated user spaces. This method is highly efficient and provides consistent environments across different stages of development and deployment.

Virtualization: Virtualization involves creating virtual machines (VMs) that emulate physical computers. Each VM runs its own operating system (OS) and includes virtualized hardware, which can be resource-intensive. Virtualization allows for multiple OS environments on a single physical machine, offering flexibility and strong isolation.

Containerization vs. Virtualization

Understanding Containerization vs. Virtualization

Best Practices for Using Containerization vs. Virtualization

By following these best practices for both containerization and virtualization, organizations can ensure efficient, secure, and reliable IT environments:

Best Practices for Containerization

Use Lightweight Base Images

Starting with minimal base images is crucial for optimizing performance and reducing the attack surface of your containers. Lightweight images speed up the build process, reduce deployment times, and minimize resource consumption. For example, Alpine Linux is a popular choice for its small footprint and security features.

Isolate Microservices

Deploying each microservice in its own container ensures modularity and ease of management. This isolation allows each service to be developed, tested, and scaled independently. It also enhances fault tolerance, as issues in one microservice do not directly impact others. For instance, Spotify isolates its music streaming, recommendation engine, and user interface into separate containers to ensure efficient management and scaling.

Automate with CI/CD

Integrate containers into your CI/CD pipeline to automate the build, test, and deployment processes. Tools like Jenkins, GitLab CI, and CircleCI can help streamline these tasks. Automation reduces human error, accelerates the development cycle, and ensures consistent deployments. Netflix, for example, uses Jenkins for CI/CD to automate the testing and deployment of its microservices.

Monitor and Log

Using monitoring tools like Prometheus and logging tools like the ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) is essential for tracking container performance and troubleshooting issues. These tools provide insights into resource utilization, application performance, and system health, enabling proactive issue resolution. Netflix employs Prometheus for real-time monitoring and ELK Stack for centralized logging and analysis.

Implement Security Measures

Regularly update container images to patch vulnerabilities and use non-root users to minimize the impact of potential security breaches. Scanning images for vulnerabilities using tools like Clair or Trivy ensures that containers remain secure. Implementing network policies and using secrets management tools further enhance security. Google Cloud Platform integrates with security tools to provide comprehensive container security solutions.

Best Practices for Virtualization

Optimize Resource Allocation

Using hypervisors like VMware or Hyper-V allows efficient allocation of resources to virtual machines (VMs), avoiding over-provisioning. Proper resource allocation ensures that VMs have sufficient resources to operate effectively without wasting physical hardware. Bank of America optimizes resource allocation to ensure secure and efficient operation of its financial applications.

Regularly Update VMs

Keeping the operating system (OS) and software on your VMs up to date is critical to protecting against vulnerabilities. Regular updates and patches prevent security breaches and maintain system stability. Salesforce continuously updates its virtualized environments to ensure robust performance and security for its CRM software.

Implement Snapshots and Backups

Regularly creating snapshots and backups of VMs allows quick recovery from failures or configuration errors. Snapshots capture the state of a VM at a specific point in time, making it easy to roll back to a known good state. Backups ensure data integrity and availability. Companies like Bank of America use VMware’s snapshot and backup features to maintain data protection and business continuity.

Monitor Performance

Monitoring VM performance using tools like Nagios or Zabbix ensures that VMs do not overload the host system. Performance monitoring helps identify resource bottlenecks, optimize resource usage, and ensure that applications run smoothly. Salesforce uses performance monitoring to maintain optimal operation of its virtualized environments, ensuring high availability and responsiveness.

Network Isolation

Using virtual networking to isolate VMs secures communication between them and prevents unauthorized access. Virtual networks create segmented environments within the same physical infrastructure, enhancing security and performance. Bank of America leverages VMware’s virtual networking capabilities to isolate its financial applications, ensuring secure and compliant operation.

Containerization vs. Virtualization Pros&Cons

Both containerization and virtualization play crucial roles in modern software development, offering tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of leading organizations.

Performance and Efficiency

Containerization:

  • Pros: Containers are lightweight and have minimal overhead, leading to faster startup times and better resource utilization.
  • Cons: Containers share the host OS kernel, which can lead to security vulnerabilities if not managed properly.

Virtualization:

  • Pros: VMs provide strong isolation and can run different OS environments on the same physical machine.
  • Cons: VMs are heavier and slower to start, with significant overhead from running multiple OS instances.

Scalability and Flexibility

Containerization:

  • Pros: Containers can be easily scaled horizontally by deploying more instances of the containerized application. Tools like Kubernetes facilitate orchestration and scaling.
  • Cons: Containers rely on the underlying OS, limiting the types of applications and services that can be containerized.

Virtualization:

  • Pros: VMs offer flexibility to run different OS types and versions, making it easier to manage diverse workloads.
  • Cons: Scaling VMs can be resource-intensive and less efficient compared to containers.

Security

Containerization:

  • Pros: Containers can be secured using namespaces and control groups, and tools like Docker Bench can automate security checks.
  • Cons: The shared kernel model presents a risk; a vulnerability in the host OS could affect all containers.

Virtualization:

  • Pros: VMs offer strong isolation since each VM includes its own OS and virtualized hardware.
  • Cons: Managing security across multiple VMs and ensuring that each VM is properly configured can be complex.

Thought Leadership: Containerization vs. Virtualization

Use Cases and Industry Examples

Containerization

Spotify:
Spotify utilizes Docker for containerization, allowing for an efficient microservices architecture. By containerizing its services, Spotify can deploy updates independently and rapidly, ensuring seamless scalability and minimal downtime. This approach has significantly improved Spotify’s ability to handle large volumes of simultaneous user requests, providing a consistent and high-quality user experience. 

Netflix:
Netflix leverages containers to optimize its CI/CD pipeline, facilitating rapid and reliable deployments. By using containerization, Netflix can isolate microservices, test them in production-like environments, and deploy updates without affecting the entire system. This strategy enables Netflix to innovate quickly and maintain high availability and performance for its global user base. 

Virtualization

Bank of America:
Bank of America employs VMware for virtualization to create secure, isolated environments for its various applications. This virtualization strategy enhances security and compliance by isolating sensitive workloads and ensuring they run in protected virtual machines. The bank’s ability to virtualize different OS environments on the same physical infrastructure allows for better resource utilization and improved operational efficiency. 

Salesforce:

Salesforce uses virtualized environments to rigorously test and deploy its CRM software. Virtualization helps Salesforce ensure robust performance and compatibility across different OS configurations. By virtualizing their testing environments, Salesforce can simulate real-world scenarios and detect potential issues before they impact users. This practice ensures that their CRM platform remains reliable and performant, meeting the high expectations of their global customer base. 

FAQs: More about Containerization vs. Virtualization 

What are the key differences between containerization and virtualization?

Containerization involves packaging an application along with its dependencies into a container that runs on the host OS kernel, making it lightweight and efficient. Virtualization, on the other hand, involves creating virtual machines (VMs) that run their own OS and virtualized hardware, providing strong isolation and flexibility but at the cost of higher resource usage and slower performance.

How do containers and VMs impact performance?

Containers are designed to have minimal overhead, which leads to faster startup times and more efficient resource utilization compared to VMs. VMs require more resources because each VM runs a full OS, leading to significant overhead and slower startup times. This makes containers preferable for performance-critical applications where quick scaling and efficient resource use are paramount.

Which technology is better for scalability?

Containers are generally better suited for scalability due to their lightweight nature and the ease with which they can be horizontally scaled. Orchestration tools like Kubernetes streamline the deployment and scaling of containerized applications. Although VMs can also be scaled, the process is more resource-intensive and less efficient compared to containers.

How do containers and VMs address security?

Containers can be secured using mechanisms like namespaces and control groups, and security tools such as Docker Bench. However, because containers share the host OS kernel, they pose potential security risks if not properly managed. VMs offer stronger isolation since each VM operates with its own OS and virtualized hardware, providing a more secure environment. This increased security, however, comes with the need for more complex security management.

What are the best practices for managing containers and VMs?

Containers: Use lightweight base images to reduce container size, isolate microservices by deploying each in its own container, integrate containers into CI/CD pipelines for automation, monitor and log performance using tools like Prometheus and ELK Stack, and implement robust security measures such as regular updates and non-root users.

VMs: Optimize resource allocation with hypervisors like VMware or Hyper-V, keep the OS and software on VMs up to date to mitigate vulnerabilities, regularly create snapshots and backups for quick recovery, monitor VM performance using tools like Nagios or Zabbix to avoid system overload, and use virtual networking to isolate VMs and secure their communication.

 

For more information on when to use Virtual machines and containers, check out this video:

Conclusion

Choosing between containerization vs. virtualization depends on your specific needs and use cases. Containerization offers efficiency, scalability, and rapid deployment, making it ideal for modern, microservices-based applications. Virtualization provides strong isolation and flexibility, suitable for diverse and resource-intensive workloads. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each technology, businesses can make informed decisions to optimize their IT infrastructure.

Looking To Find A Trusted Tech Partner?
Tech Consulting, End-to-End Product Development, Cloud & DevOps Service! Since 2009, Savvycom has been harnessing digital technologies for the benefit of businesses, mid and large enterprises, and startups across the variety of industries. We can help you to build high-quality software solutions and products as well as deliver a wide range of related professional software development services.
Savvycom is right where you need. Contact us now for further consultation:

  • Phone: +84 24 3202 9222
  • Hotline: +1 408 663 8600 (US); +612 8006 1349 (AUS); +84 32 675 2886 (VN)
  • Email: contact@savvycomsoftware.com

393 Views
0
AboutMiley Do
The Future Of Expense Management: Turn Paper Receipts Into Digital Receipts The Future Of Expense Management: Turn Paper Receipts Into Digital Receipts June 27, 2024
Balancing Quality and Speed: Setting Realistic Expectations for Your Software Development TimelineJuly 2, 2024Balancing Quality and Speed: Setting Realistic Expectations for Your Software Development Timeline

Related Posts

Business InsightTechnology Insights
IoT Healthcare: The Future Landscape of Healthcare Industry
May 8, 2024 by Harry Nguyen
Business Insight
The Rise of Progressive Web Application Development Companies: Choosing the Best Development Partners
January 24, 2025 by Miley Do
SVC Ebook New

Explore how we can solve your IT challenges

EN Footer Contact Form New
  • United States+1
  • United Kingdom+44
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • Singapore+65
  • Australia+61
  • Afghanistan (‫افغانستان‬‎)+93
  • Albania (Shqipëri)+355
  • Algeria (‫الجزائر‬‎)+213
  • American Samoa+1
  • Andorra+376
  • Angola+244
  • Anguilla+1
  • Antigua and Barbuda+1
  • Argentina+54
  • Armenia (Հայաստան)+374
  • Aruba+297
  • Ascension Island+247
  • Australia+61
  • Austria (Österreich)+43
  • Azerbaijan (Azərbaycan)+994
  • Bahamas+1
  • Bahrain (‫البحرين‬‎)+973
  • Bangladesh (বাংলাদেশ)+880
  • Barbados+1
  • Belarus (Беларусь)+375
  • Belgium (België)+32
  • Belize+501
  • Benin (Bénin)+229
  • Bermuda+1
  • Bhutan (འབྲུག)+975
  • Bolivia+591
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina (Босна и Херцеговина)+387
  • Botswana+267
  • Brazil (Brasil)+55
  • British Indian Ocean Territory+246
  • British Virgin Islands+1
  • Brunei+673
  • Bulgaria (България)+359
  • Burkina Faso+226
  • Burundi (Uburundi)+257
  • Cambodia (កម្ពុជា)+855
  • Cameroon (Cameroun)+237
  • Canada+1
  • Cape Verde (Kabu Verdi)+238
  • Caribbean Netherlands+599
  • Cayman Islands+1
  • Central African Republic (République centrafricaine)+236
  • Chad (Tchad)+235
  • Chile+56
  • China (中国)+86
  • Christmas Island+61
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands+61
  • Colombia+57
  • Comoros (‫جزر القمر‬‎)+269
  • Congo (DRC) (Jamhuri ya Kidemokrasia ya Kongo)+243
  • Congo (Republic) (Congo-Brazzaville)+242
  • Cook Islands+682
  • Costa Rica+506
  • Côte d’Ivoire+225
  • Croatia (Hrvatska)+385
  • Cuba+53
  • Curaçao+599
  • Cyprus (Κύπρος)+357
  • Czech Republic (Česká republika)+420
  • Denmark (Danmark)+45
  • Djibouti+253
  • Dominica+1
  • Dominican Republic (República Dominicana)+1
  • Ecuador+593
  • Egypt (‫مصر‬‎)+20
  • El Salvador+503
  • Equatorial Guinea (Guinea Ecuatorial)+240
  • Eritrea+291
  • Estonia (Eesti)+372
  • Eswatini+268
  • Ethiopia+251
  • Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)+500
  • Faroe Islands (Føroyar)+298
  • Fiji+679
  • Finland (Suomi)+358
  • France+33
  • French Guiana (Guyane française)+594
  • French Polynesia (Polynésie française)+689
  • Gabon+241
  • Gambia+220
  • Georgia (საქართველო)+995
  • Germany (Deutschland)+49
  • Ghana (Gaana)+233
  • Gibraltar+350
  • Greece (Ελλάδα)+30
  • Greenland (Kalaallit Nunaat)+299
  • Grenada+1
  • Guadeloupe+590
  • Guam+1
  • Guatemala+502
  • Guernsey+44
  • Guinea (Guinée)+224
  • Guinea-Bissau (Guiné Bissau)+245
  • Guyana+592
  • Haiti+509
  • Honduras+504
  • Hong Kong (香港)+852
  • Hungary (Magyarország)+36
  • Iceland (Ísland)+354
  • India (भारत)+91
  • Indonesia+62
  • Iran (‫ایران‬‎)+98
  • Iraq (‫العراق‬‎)+964
  • Ireland+353
  • Isle of Man+44
  • Israel (‫ישראל‬‎)+972
  • Italy (Italia)+39
  • Jamaica+1
  • Japan (日本)+81
  • Jersey+44
  • Jordan (‫الأردن‬‎)+962
  • Kazakhstan (Казахстан)+7
  • Kenya+254
  • Kiribati+686
  • Kosovo+383
  • Kuwait (‫الكويت‬‎)+965
  • Kyrgyzstan (Кыргызстан)+996
  • Laos (ລາວ)+856
  • Latvia (Latvija)+371
  • Lebanon (‫لبنان‬‎)+961
  • Lesotho+266
  • Liberia+231
  • Libya (‫ليبيا‬‎)+218
  • Liechtenstein+423
  • Lithuania (Lietuva)+370
  • Luxembourg+352
  • Macau (澳門)+853
  • Madagascar (Madagasikara)+261
  • Malawi+265
  • Malaysia+60
  • Maldives+960
  • Mali+223
  • Malta+356
  • Marshall Islands+692
  • Martinique+596
  • Mauritania (‫موريتانيا‬‎)+222
  • Mauritius (Moris)+230
  • Mayotte+262
  • Mexico (México)+52
  • Micronesia+691
  • Moldova (Republica Moldova)+373
  • Monaco+377
  • Mongolia (Монгол)+976
  • Montenegro (Crna Gora)+382
  • Montserrat+1
  • Morocco (‫المغرب‬‎)+212
  • Mozambique (Moçambique)+258
  • Myanmar (Burma) (မြန်မာ)+95
  • Namibia (Namibië)+264
  • Nauru+674
  • Nepal (नेपाल)+977
  • Netherlands (Nederland)+31
  • New Caledonia (Nouvelle-Calédonie)+687
  • New Zealand+64
  • Nicaragua+505
  • Niger (Nijar)+227
  • Nigeria+234
  • Niue+683
  • Norfolk Island+672
  • North Korea (조선 민주주의 인민 공화국)+850
  • North Macedonia (Северна Македонија)+389
  • Northern Mariana Islands+1
  • Norway (Norge)+47
  • Oman (‫عُمان‬‎)+968
  • Pakistan (‫پاکستان‬‎)+92
  • Palau+680
  • Palestine (‫فلسطين‬‎)+970
  • Panama (Panamá)+507
  • Papua New Guinea+675
  • Paraguay+595
  • Peru (Perú)+51
  • Philippines+63
  • Poland (Polska)+48
  • Portugal+351
  • Puerto Rico+1
  • Qatar (‫قطر‬‎)+974
  • Réunion (La Réunion)+262
  • Romania (România)+40
  • Russia (Россия)+7
  • Rwanda+250
  • Saint Barthélemy+590
  • Saint Helena+290
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis+1
  • Saint Lucia+1
  • Saint Martin (Saint-Martin (partie française))+590
  • Saint Pierre and Miquelon (Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon)+508
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines+1
  • Samoa+685
  • San Marino+378
  • São Tomé and Príncipe (São Tomé e Príncipe)+239
  • Saudi Arabia (‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬‎)+966
  • Senegal (Sénégal)+221
  • Serbia (Србија)+381
  • Seychelles+248
  • Sierra Leone+232
  • Singapore+65
  • Sint Maarten+1
  • Slovakia (Slovensko)+421
  • Slovenia (Slovenija)+386
  • Solomon Islands+677
  • Somalia (Soomaaliya)+252
  • South Africa+27
  • South Korea (대한민국)+82
  • South Sudan (‫جنوب السودان‬‎)+211
  • Spain (España)+34
  • Sri Lanka (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව)+94
  • Sudan (‫السودان‬‎)+249
  • Suriname+597
  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen+47
  • Sweden (Sverige)+46
  • Switzerland (Schweiz)+41
  • Syria (‫سوريا‬‎)+963
  • Taiwan (台灣)+886
  • Tajikistan+992
  • Tanzania+255
  • Thailand (ไทย)+66
  • Timor-Leste+670
  • Togo+228
  • Tokelau+690
  • Tonga+676
  • Trinidad and Tobago+1
  • Tunisia (‫تونس‬‎)+216
  • Turkey (Türkiye)+90
  • Turkmenistan+993
  • Turks and Caicos Islands+1
  • Tuvalu+688
  • U.S. Virgin Islands+1
  • Uganda+256
  • Ukraine (Україна)+380
  • United Arab Emirates (‫الإمارات العربية المتحدة‬‎)+971
  • United Kingdom+44
  • United States+1
  • Uruguay+598
  • Uzbekistan (Oʻzbekiston)+998
  • Vanuatu+678
  • Vatican City (Città del Vaticano)+39
  • Venezuela+58
  • Vietnam (Việt Nam)+84
  • Wallis and Futuna (Wallis-et-Futuna)+681
  • Western Sahara (‫الصحراء الغربية‬‎)+212
  • Yemen (‫اليمن‬‎)+967
  • Zambia+260
  • Zimbabwe+263
  • Åland Islands+358
Logo sav slogan

Software Development Outsourcing Company

Logo Goup

FOLLOW US

facebook linkedin behance dribble youtube twitter

 

Privacy Policy

SAVVYCOM HEADQUATERS

Location: Level 7, Sky Park Tower B, No. 3 Ton That Thuyet, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Phone: +84 24 3202 9222

Hotline: +84 352 287 866

Email: marketing@savvycomsoftware.com

 

SUBSCRIBE US

Sign up to get the latest updates and amazing offers delivered directly to your inbox.

Footer Subscribe Us Form (#18)

GLOBAL OFFICES

Savvycom USA

Laguna Beach, California 92677, USA.

+1 949 306 4719

Savvycom Korea

Room 504, Jinhak Hoegwan Building, No.38 Jongno3-gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul (Cheongjin-dong), Korea.


Savvycom Australia

Level 2, 24-26 Falcon Street, Crows Nest, NSW 2065, Australia.

+61 2 8006 5011

Savvycom Thailand

No. 159/22, Rama 6 Mansion B, Charan Sanitwong Road 96/1, Bang O, Bang Phlat, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.

Savvycom Japan

30F, Tower N, Shinjuku Park Tower, 3-7-1 Nishi-Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 163-1030, Japan.

+81 3 5326 3113

Savvycom Singapore

470 North Bridge Road, #05-12, Bugis Cube, Singapore 188735.

Copyright © 2024 Savvycom. All Rights Reserved